Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 01:45:58 +0100 From: Bartosz Fabianowski <freebsd@chillt.de> To: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@freebsd.org>, Robert Burmeister <Robert.Burmeister@UToledo.edu> Cc: tcberner@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, kde-freebsd@kde.org, jbeich@FreeBSD.org, mat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fwd: 2017-02-18 Update to Qt 4 and Qt 5 Message-ID: <64ae73f4-7a79-2a6a-7c71-d16bdd9fec50@chillt.de> In-Reply-To: <86bmtyo210.fsf@orwell> References: <58A918E6.7080504@UToledo.edu> <86bmtyo210.fsf@orwell>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
qtchooser conflicts with a number of Qt 4 ports, because they installed
binaries into /usr/local/bin that qtchooser wants to replace with its
own scripts now.
I just nuked all conflicting ports, installed qtchooser and reinstalled
the ports afterward.
- Bartosz
On 19/02/2017 12:25, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Robert Burmeister <Robert.Burmeister@UToledo.edu> writes:
>
>> kde@FreeBSD.org is not accepting mail
>>
>>> UPDATING
>>> Following what is already done in Qt 5, the Qt 4 ports no longer install
>>> their binaries into ${LOCALBASE}/bin (which is "/usr/local/bin" in most
>>> cases). Additionally, the "-qt4" suffix has been dropped from the file names
>>> of the binaries that had it, such as "qmake-qt4".
>>>
>>
>> Could we have portupgrade instructions?
>
> We'd be more than glad to add those if someone can provide them; I have
> not used portupgrade myself since at least 2009, so it's hard for me to
> provide any instructions.
>
>> Neither QT4 nor QT5 will build on my FreeBSD 11 i386 system.
>
> Can you clarify? What errors are you seeing?
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?64ae73f4-7a79-2a6a-7c71-d16bdd9fec50>