Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 05:31:58 -0700 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kaleb@x.org> Cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Policy on printf format specifiers? Message-ID: <6585.811427518@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Sep 1995 07:47:42 EST." <199509181147.HAA15090@exalt.x.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Er, I don't have my copy of 10646 here at home. As I recall page 0 is just > Latin1. If page 0 is in fact Unicode, which already has encodings for every > written language on Earth, then what would 10646 need any other pages for? The rest of the languages of course. :-) Remember that the american continent wasn't with for until they found it... As far as I recall there is still some concern about Sanskrit and 10646 isn't there ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Just that: dried leaves in boiling water ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6585.811427518>