Date: 10 Feb 2003 12:02:24 +0100 From: "clemens fischer" <ino-qc@spotteswoode.de.eu.org> To: "Wes Peters" <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: "Pawel Jakub Dawidek" <nick@garage.freebsd.pl>, " Giorgos Keramidas" <keramida@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, zaks@prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl Subject: Re: Missing commit bit [PATCH]. Message-ID: <65rsxutb.fsf@ID-23066.news.dfncis.de> In-Reply-To: <200302091323.35681.wes@softweyr.com> (Wes Peters's message of "Sun, 9 Feb 2003 13:23:35 %2B0000") References: <20030204094840.E1A083ABB3B@milla.ask33.net> <20030205195309.GA71510@garage.freebsd.pl> <wuk9qmzv.fsf@ID-23066.news.dfncis.de> <200302091323.35681.wes@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/rules.html sorry to insist, but even after following all the links in the slashdot-story this isn't clear to me. was it really about the ipfw-hack he proposed? there were eight (or so) emails cited from a developers list, which looked quite civil to me. it seemed a technical discussion with the "new-kernel <-> old libs" problem at its heart, certainly no "dirty linen" there. clemens To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?65rsxutb.fsf>