Date: 25 Jun 2001 00:05:36 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre-lists@noos.fr> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "include" directive in config(8) (was: Two Junior Kernel Hacker tasks..) Message-ID: <66dlbkjz.fsf@gits.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20010624204114.F2B913E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> References: <20010624204114.F2B913E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> writes: > Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> writes: > > Is there a way to "undef" an option? > > I thought about this, too. Right now there isn't a way to do that, > and neither OpenBSD nor NetBSD have one AFAIK. That said, I think it > would be trivial to implement. The list of options and devices is a > simple linked list (mind you, it's a home-grown one, not queue(3)); it > shouldn't be too hard to implement "unoption" and "undevice" > directives. how about "undef options XXX" and "undef device XXX", etc. ? Cyrille. -- home: mailto:clefevre@redirect.to UNIX is user-friendly; it's just particular work: mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre@edf.fr about who it chooses to be friends with. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?66dlbkjz.fsf>