Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 20:20:24 +0100 From: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> To: Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Greg Byshenk <freebsd@byshenk.net> Subject: Re: push a few config files to dozen or so servers Message-ID: <6CC9FCD8-EB12-4DD1-A76E-8F43C044340F@ultra-secure.de> In-Reply-To: <3552828A-536D-41AB-B56D-F47AA4164A79@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> References: <20150205130234.3fcbabfb@efreet.mimar.rs> <op.xtk288tykndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local> <54D37932.7010808@madpilot.net> <20150205154743.GO88387@mail0.byshenk.net> <3552828A-536D-41AB-B56D-F47AA4164A79@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>=20 > Despite all that, there is still lots and lots to recommend Puppet. =20= > However, if there's another configuration management framework that is=20= > more "FreeBSD-friendly," then it would be good to know of that. With=20= > large-scale system installations becoming more and more prevalent, so=20= > too does the importance of configuration management and orchestration=20= > systems. I've been looking at Salt recently, which I've heard is=20 > supposed to be quite "FreeBSD-friendly." Does anyone know of any=20 > others that have a great FreeBSD community and support behind them? There=E2=80=99s also chef, which has as little (or even less) support = for FreeBSD. But I believe it=E2=80=99s the most powerful of the ones available. I=E2=80=99ve always wanted to try ansible, which looks like it has = decent support for FreeBSD. Anybody got experience with that?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6CC9FCD8-EB12-4DD1-A76E-8F43C044340F>