Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:49:00 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Plan for commiting Xilinx Zynq support to HEAD Message-ID: <6E0C620F-D46C-4D01-86AE-0F364C67500F@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20130418174501.GF16132@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130416212535.GE16132@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-VmokBrj70yMyZ5prB_KAW7SPXCiRfHpZ-PJvjbsNkYxhDcQ@mail.gmail.com> <516EBE26.60505@sbcglobal.net> <20130418174501.GF16132@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 18, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:22:14AM -0700, Thomas Skibo wrote: >>=20 >> I'll take a look at doing that. >=20 > Instead of dumping to Wiki (lots of time), you can make a script = (little > time, better) and figure out where to put it in FreeBSD. Somewhere in > src/contrib/tools could work. We do need it documented on the wiki regardless of the automation we put = into place. The problem with scripts is that accrue arcane knowledge = that later becomes hard to reconstruct. > We already have some mini-BSD scripts there. You can take a look if = it's > worth adding cross-building for Zynq there. I'd argue that we're rapidly growing too many of these tools... Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6E0C620F-D46C-4D01-86AE-0F364C67500F>