Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:44:29 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal: multi-instance and self-contained rc.d script Message-ID: <6E2CC3DE-E77E-4ECB-AA14-B90BAD2DFB3E@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgmz7TCswUv0mojExsHimPhHM%2BR7ASw0MEYWy=2=bHHY=w@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130701.062953.1443190655468739608.hrs@allbsd.org> <20130630221032.GB43309@stack.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307010624530.29556@wonkity.com> <CAF6rxgmz7TCswUv0mojExsHimPhHM%2BR7ASw0MEYWy=2=bHHY=w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 1, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> = wrote: >> '/etc/rc.d/routed manpage' would return the generated mdoc code. >> '/etc/rc.d/routed help' could pipe that output to man. >=20 > We should discourage directly running rc.d scripts and should instead > encourage people to use the service(1) interface. >=20 > +1 for both ideas though: they both sound like a very good direction = to go in. I just need a tcsh magic command to make command completion work with = service. :) Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6E2CC3DE-E77E-4ECB-AA14-B90BAD2DFB3E>