Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 17:51:02 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf-mardorf@riseup.net> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Docker Message-ID: <6dabf603dcaea28c2ab3389d13505c70314c0e70.camel@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <6cbc4a9e-bbb0-bedb-2941-9511c4232312@tundraware.com> References: <20230329053443.6ADA6B6AFED5@dhcp-8e64.meeting.ietf.org> <8E16D624-2655-4A10-844A-93E4F63E9859@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <078a1cf8-7ae2-c593-615b-f5f37fa2b3eb@timpreston.net> <CA%2B1FSij9j922Nvv1Vhn43HznwpyGT99UZsU674G9hHWzR=UhvQ@mail.gmail.com> <06be3a1e-9319-1a21-88b9-4f87328ee127@timpreston.net> <CA%2B1FSijc%2B-OLNsyFNdR=jP3VzMi4zUE92i5iv9Pfg6AryDy_KQ@mail.gmail.com> <34b4b76e-1c41-4cfb-9e86-856f01e8abc9@app.fastmail.com> <CA%2B1FSihVrJ8cZ4ZU6mMr0sKJsZ98V4fh2vpDLugw7MGj-%2BEBPg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B1FSijL50mQ-HveBA4HZeNkSoaORv=aty-15nNLzn9amzY_nw@mail.gmail.com> <6002f636-310b-a9fd-b82f-346618976983@timpreston.net> <CA%2B1FSigV_pPwVW%2BDd8WZYGcNQVt7%2BYOcsnJFoRhS6jL5A636pg@mail.gmail.com> <d0da9627-3ff7-fcca-f9dc-6c2d1c874ef2@tundraware.com> <9efb1204ede36008eb1bc83b6048d9c41ea2ab86.camel@riseup.net> <6cbc4a9e-bbb0-bedb-2941-9511c4232312@tundraware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2023-04-16 at 10:04 -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > My point is that these extra pieces of tooling are not really "layers" > such much as ways to manage running containers at large scale.=C2=A0 They > are not needed or recommend for smaller use cases. Hi, my apologies for my half-knowledge, I was probably a little too biased. I'm that biased since nowadays even Linux packages are often replaced by containers (snap, flatpak etc.). Regards, Ralf
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6dabf603dcaea28c2ab3389d13505c70314c0e70.camel>