Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:58:15 +0100
From:      Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
To:        Jakob Alvermark <jakob@alvermark.net>
Cc:        Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, x11@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 'End' key stopped working (xfce)
Message-ID:  <7210540F-BC2D-4EB8-BF56-C754450938C1@grem.de>
In-Reply-To: <43713fc4-ea9b-1e77-0bb7-5b3f20ff3900@alvermark.net>
References:  <43713fc4-ea9b-1e77-0bb7-5b3f20ff3900@alvermark.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On 26. Jan 2021, at 13:55, Jakob Alvermark <jakob@alvermark.net> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFOn 1/26/21 11:01 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>> On 26/01/21 10:45, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
>>>=20
>>> On 1/21/21 9:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
>>>> On 21/01/21 09:10, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
>>>>> On 1/21/21 8:54 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:49:39AM +0100, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Something strange is going on here.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> I changed one shortcut, next time I restarted xfce my up-arrow key
>>>>>>> doesn't work.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> I changed one shortcut without restarting xfce and the up-arrow work=
s
>>>>>>> again...
>>>>>> You might find reading the discussion in the following bugzilla PR
>>>>>> useful (esp. comment #54): https://bugs.freebsd.org/244290.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> ./danfe
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Thanks for the suggestion, applying the change suggested in #54 seems t=
o have fixed the issue.
>>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> What change exactly? If there is a change that reliably mitigates the i=
ssue it could be included in the ports tree, but I'm not sure I understand w=
hat to change exaclty.
>>>>=20
>>>> It looks like removing the "ungrab" code line causes other regressions,=
 so I'm not sure is a good candidate.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> The change that worked was adding back the ungrab line that was removed i=
n that commit.
>>>=20
>>=20
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>=20
>> If that change really works for most users it's a good candidate for incl=
usion in the ports tree. I'd also try to get it back upstream.
>>=20
>> I followed up to bug 244290 about this.
>>=20
>> But since I'm not experiencing the issue myself I can't test this. So I'm=
 asking for consensus from users.
>>=20
>=20
> By chance I discovered that it seems it only happens when you have UDEV op=
tion on xorg-server.
>=20
> (Which I do. Tracking -current all pkgs was upgraded when -current was bum=
ped to 14, and the binary package of xorg-server does not have udev enabled)=

>=20

Any chance that your keymap config is simply wrong/doesn=E2=80=99t match lib=
input? (You can check that by using setxkbmap to set the correct keymap expl=
icitly). Maybe you could share your X11 config files/your .xinitrc.

-m

>=20
> Jakob
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7210540F-BC2D-4EB8-BF56-C754450938C1>