Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:18 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports Management Team <portmgr@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>, gerald@pfeifer.com, Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) Message-ID: <727BA28F-ECA5-4094-B1D1-E8F122770D56@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <20170311181339.58bcf2a8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <20170311113355.0f3f8b77@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> <20170311181339.58bcf2a8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:13, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan = Beich) wrote: >> Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> writes: >>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer = <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote: >>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>>>=20 >>>> One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP,=20 >>>> which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) =20 >>>=20 >>> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. =20 >>=20 >> It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. >>=20 >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 >=20 > Ugh, can portmgr approve the attached = patch?<fetchenv.patch>_______________________________________________ If distfiles from sites with invalid certificates won't fetch for = end-users, they won't fetch during makesum either. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?727BA28F-ECA5-4094-B1D1-E8F122770D56>