Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:15:33 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Providing a default graphical environment on FreeBSD Message-ID: <74299.1347956133@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:08:52 %2B0200." <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209181004510.44656@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209181004510.44656@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, Wojci ech Puchar writes: >That's all true. But do anyone understand why there is still so much >pressure for every open source OS and specifically *BSD on "default >desktop environment" or similar ideas? Tell you what: When you have at least 75% of the user population of FreeBSD agreeing on which window manager we should offer as the default, we can talk about this. Until such a consensus exists, this discussion is just a waste of time. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?74299.1347956133>