Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:02:36 -0700 From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp Message-ID: <74CA0A5F-63EF-4B1B-B237-7A8DB76333A6@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <C40EB001-4790-4BB9-A580-6D57D2CBC340@ultra-secure.de> References: <4F9A2AAE-938F-4FF5-A30C-72689D7F1F39@hub.org> <20130424093505.0f3e4415@suse3> <C643EE8D-5934-48EA-9305-EE6A07C5C897@hub.org> <C40EB001-4790-4BB9-A580-6D57D2CBC340@ultra-secure.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-04-24, at 12:48 , Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> wrote: >=20 > In the NFS mount options. > I've re-done my tests and it still seems to be a problem.=20 'k, just to clarify =85 your tests are with the Broadcom chipset(s)? I = have an Intel card on order, so will run tests against that as soon as = it gets here to see how it changes =85 Just curious, but what are you running for tests? I noticed it = visually, but other then using something like iozone21, not sure what = is useful for coming up with a benchmark =85
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?74CA0A5F-63EF-4B1B-B237-7A8DB76333A6>