Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 20:15:52 -0500 From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> To: davids@nswcc.org.au Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K compliance question Message-ID: <79022.916362952@gjp.erols.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:56:38 %2B1100." <D0D9AB571768D211AA150008C74CF8E4027B58@MERCURY>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
david schanzer wrote in message ID <D0D9AB571768D211AA150008C74CF8E4027B58@MERCURY>: > We are running three servers using FreeBSD v2.0. Yes, I know it's a very old > version. Is version 2.0 Y2K compliant, and if not, what is the minimum > version for which your statement, "After extensive analysis and testing, we > believe that FreeBSD is 100% Y2K compliant", is true? FreeBSD 2.0 was not tested. We strongly suggest upgrading your servers to 2.2.8, preferably 2.2-stable. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?79022.916362952>