Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:04:13 -0500 From: "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linuxolator: LTP lseek03 failure Message-ID: <790a9fff0705040004oab16ed8q1a1c476386379ea9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0705021345j2ad9ae98o56aaf357d556fe27@mail.gmail.com> References: <790a9fff0705021345j2ad9ae98o56aaf357d556fe27@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/2/07, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> wrote: > I have investigated the new LTP test failure for lseek03, and the > first test sets whence to 4 (SEEK_HOLE): > > test 1 lseek(tfile_1554, 1, 4) Failed, errno=25 Inappropriate ioctl > for device, expected 22(EINVAL) > Looking thru -CURRENT, I found that SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA were added to lseek (sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c 1.437) on April 5th, 2007 by pjd as a requirement for the ZFS implementation. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?790a9fff0705040004oab16ed8q1a1c476386379ea9>