Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:51:43 -0700 From: "Janky Jay, III" <jankyj@unfs.us> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: yasu@utahime.org Subject: ClamAV Port Version Regression? Message-ID: <7971a617-6aa9-c18e-d53e-fbd8985bb043@unfs.us>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--ayxrKBRZjtLWrNhtvg0myWugmoyXYZRTP
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="VCH57ZXmwb5iWztD2tvjsHsHV7PgB7h6p";
protected-headers="v1"
From: "Janky Jay, III" <jankyj@unfs.us>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc: yasu@utahime.org
Message-ID: <7971a617-6aa9-c18e-d53e-fbd8985bb043@unfs.us>
Subject: ClamAV Port Version Regression?
--VCH57ZXmwb5iWztD2tvjsHsHV7PgB7h6p
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,
After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following:
clamav-0.101.0_2 < needs updating (index has 0.100.2,=
1)
The version that is claiming to be the latest appears to be a version
regression. Am I wrong here? I checked the ClamAV site and it appears
version 0.101.0 is, in fact, the latest. So, I'm wondering if there was
possibly a revision issue that's causing this?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
--VCH57ZXmwb5iWztD2tvjsHsHV7PgB7h6p--
--ayxrKBRZjtLWrNhtvg0myWugmoyXYZRTP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iF0EARECAB0WIQT3labtx1DPvRcqv5cYrcyxRslmfgUCXA/5NwAKCRAYrcyxRslm
fo5gAJ4610pRoul87nHOdDvEBZLABwZrXACfXj248OBjggOYWR9y5nQ6sf1hqb0=
=4G1p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ayxrKBRZjtLWrNhtvg0myWugmoyXYZRTP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7971a617-6aa9-c18e-d53e-fbd8985bb043>