Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:19:35 +0300 From: "Vlad GALU" <vladgalu@gmail.com> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (Another) simple benchmark Message-ID: <79722fad0605182319o2eefa538i8505631f8802d5d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BBF811FC-8BD3-4081-8922-50128C7C7E45@shire.net> References: <446CCE1C.1050200@fer.hr> <446CD873.9080903@stevehodgson.co.uk> <446CE6CE.50009@fer.hr> <BBF811FC-8BD3-4081-8922-50128C7C7E45@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/19/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <chad@shire.net> wrote: > > On May 18, 2006, at 3:27 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > > > > > Using lighttpd or ab on other host is not really applicable - I > > wasn't trying to configure the box for production, only ran the > > benchmarks out of curiosity. Apache *should* work ok out of the box > > on FreeBSD :) > > (btw. apache was installed from binary package) > > Au Contraire > > You were not testing apache. You were testing apache and ab. It > very well could be that ab is the culprit, not apache. We'll never > know unless you can retest with ab on another box. Still, the fact that a simple program, regardless of its nature, runs a lot faster on Linux than it does on FreeBSD is a problem, isn't it ? > > Chad > > --- > Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC > Your Web App and Email hosting provider > chad at shire.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > --=20 If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?79722fad0605182319o2eefa538i8505631f8802d5d>