Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:31:06 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: soft updates performance Message-ID: <79800.982024266@winston.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> of "13 Feb 2001 01:25:41 %2B0100." <xzpy9vbo2d6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> writes: > > [...] That implies to me, at least, that after a certain > > point the CPU is going to be the bottleneck. > > More likely RAM bandwidth. Those 133 Mhz FSBs ought to help, though. If RAM bandwidth was the bottleneck here then putting /usr/src and /usr/obj into an MFS would have represented a pessimization over simply leaving that on disk. I would have thought that would be obvious. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?79800.982024266>