Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:59:06 -0400
From:      George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com>
To:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Is there any reason not to remove all the spl() calls in rtsock.c?
Message-ID:  <7DC6C171-3802-4B5D-B2D8-2191C6FF6DBA@neville-neil.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Howdy,

I was just reviewing the code in rtsock.c, specifically rts_attach().  =
Is there any reason
not to just remove the spl* calls?  I don't see anything obvious that =
needs protection
that is not now protected by a finer grained lock.

Best,
George

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAk22JuoACgkQYdh2wUQKM9KWJgCglcc31hS2sQrzlrJTcZRK1zCc
Y0gAnjNcE4AdBpOeh7oQGtD2nUTXr6tx
=3Dzx2e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7DC6C171-3802-4B5D-B2D8-2191C6FF6DBA>