Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:57:34 -0800
From:      Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com>
To:        Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: textproc/libxml2 and failed patching after using portsnap...
Message-ID:  <7d6fde3d0901171557v4e2d6e9enc564c8bdab100931@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49725E61.6070701@freebsd.org>
References:  <7d6fde3d0901171349o20f1b8d2x944bcae5394b8eb9@mail.gmail.com> <49725E61.6070701@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>>    This is just a notice that a patch is no longer needed with
>> textproc/libxml2 -- it appears to have been checked in upstream:
>>
>>    This isn't noted in the CVSweb interface, so I assume the file is
>> stale. However, it was recently synced (today at ~noon) with portsnap.
>
> Does running 'portsnap extract textproc/libxml2' make the problem
> patch go away?

    Yes. Is this an issue with the `update' logic?
Thanks,
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d6fde3d0901171557v4e2d6e9enc564c8bdab100931>