Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 Feb 2010 12:52:42 -0800
From:      Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com>
To:        Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Recent massive port update.
Message-ID:  <7d6fde3d1002061252i19aa684aw8363ac1ca61c4c29@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100206224504.697dc717@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
References:  <1781265383542@webmail54.yandex.ru> <20100206004206.5b87b5ee@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <01qv37-4ho2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4B6D3D80.5000400@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4B6DCBA2.5030202@quip.cz> <20100206224504.697dc717@it.buh.tecnik93.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org> wrote=
:
> On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100
> Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote:
>
>> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
>> >
>> >> Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be
>> >> rebuildet first?
>> >>
>> >> I rebuilded everything - but i have no idea about the order aof
>> >> port reinstalling.
>> >
>> > Actually that's not necessary in this case entirely because the
>> > commit was so large. =A0Every port that needs to be rebuilt because
>> > it depends on libjpeg has had it's PORTREVISION bumped. =A0That means
>> > that if you just do a 'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' the right
>> > thing will happen automatically.
>>
>>
>> No metter if there is revision bump or not, it should be in UPDATING
>> as it was in case of jpeg-7.
>>
>> 20090719:
>> =A0 =A0AFFECTS: users of graphics/jpeg
>> =A0 =A0AUTHOR: dinoex@FreeBSD.org
>>
>> =A0 =A0The IJG jpeg library has been updated to version 7.0. =A0Please
>> rebuild all ports that depend on it.
>
> No need, since it a port has a new version, a rebuild is expected.

    Excessive documentation is not any more helpful than no
documentation. I would think it's relatively common sense to rebuild
all applications that depend upon a library, and the things that
handle this requirement should do so in a seamless manner, and are
from my understanding (minus manual port installations).
Cheers,
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d6fde3d1002061252i19aa684aw8363ac1ca61c4c29>