Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:11:45 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> To: hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.0-RC3 uploaded for ia64 Message-ID: <7miswkn61q.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <200301192152.h0JLqHj3033815@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <20030119212337.GQ7189@skriver.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:52:17 +0100 (CET),
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> That's really not necessary, because there's a ports.tgz in
> every snapshot and every release, and of course it can be
> checked out from the repo, too. And there's cvsweb, too.
Hmm, should we really remove extracted source tree from ftp?
Yes, this is a nightmare for mirror administrators, but extracted src/
and ports/ is one of the easiest way to check a single file content.
Nowadays, I usually use cvsweb (and locally checked out files) to
check single file. For old branches (such as RELENG_2_2), I can use
files carried by ftp. I personally do not require these extracted
files on ftp. But I don't know how many users use them.
--
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7miswkn61q.wl>