Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:30:53 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: add inverse option to ministat Message-ID: <80033.1436992253@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <20150715174139.GJ8523@funkthat.com> References: <20150715002013.GZ8523@funkthat.com> <77609.1436942964@critter.freebsd.dk> <20150715071534.GE8523@funkthat.com> <78059.1436947590@critter.freebsd.dk> <20150715174139.GJ8523@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <20150715174139.GJ8523@funkthat.com>, John-Mark Gurney writes: >There are lots of tools the repeat functionality... and it's only >getting worse... And the amount of code that this adds is strikingly >small... We do agree that is not a coherent argument, right ? I still think it is a step in the wrong direction, and that it should therefore not be taken. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?80033.1436992253>