Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:44:21 -0400
From:      "Jim Stapleton" <stapleton.41@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Questions on EXT3 vs standard BSD partitions
Message-ID:  <80f4f2b20606300944y57a8d7bfqba7dd75ab32fdf46@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have to move between BSD and Linux on one system quite a bit, and I
was wondering if there  were any reasons to avoid EXT3 on a filesystem
(such as /dev/ad0s1), as opposed to using the more standard BSD setups
(such as UFS on /dev/ad0s1a)? I'm thinking mostly in terms of
reliability, but also in terms of flexibility and speed.

Is there anything that should absolutely stay in UFS (such as /boot?)

Thanks,
-Jim Stapleton



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?80f4f2b20606300944y57a8d7bfqba7dd75ab32fdf46>