Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:41:47 -0800 From: Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New malloc ready, take 42 Message-ID: <811F628B-A89B-4359-A219-13B5337726A9@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <43B3768F.40704@freebsd.org> References: <E1E22E2D-A6D5-49CC-9649-C37C50F0443B@freebsd.org> <43B36B83.7080404@freebsd.org> <32729773-B07C-4AEE-92D0-62ACE0E3AFEB@freebsd.org> <43B36EB9.70205@freebsd.org> <2E722A13-C880-41B6-A84C-3927C8FE90E5@freebsd.org> <43B3768F.40704@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 28, 2005, at 9:39 PM, David Xu wrote: > > OK, I have linked /etc/malloc.conf to aj, this changes the > performance: > > %super-smack ./select-key.smack 4 10000 > Query Barrel Report for client smacker1 > connect: max=23ms min=0ms avg= 5ms from 4 clients > Query_type num_queries max_time min_time > q_per_s > select_index 80000 0 0 20480.54 > select_index 80000 0 0 19734.14 > select_index 80000 0 0 19846.49 > select_index 80000 0 0 20045.10 > select_index 80000 0 0 19544.33 > > but it still can not beat phkmalloc. :-) What is the performance of phkmalloc under those testing conditions? Thanks, Jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?811F628B-A89B-4359-A219-13B5337726A9>