Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:53:37 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: "Helmut Schneider" <jumper99@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Big patches Message-ID: <81610638@h30.sp.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <xn0hi0msq2gi3a000@news.gmane.org> (Helmut Schneider's message of "Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <xn0hi0msq2gi3a000@news.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be > avoided=C2=B4at most costs. > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at > least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted the > patches on tuesday. > So, what should I do? Still create full pkg-plists and hope that the > patch passes the FreeBSD PR system or fall back to dynamic pkg-plists? You may try to reduce pkg-plist changes. Are you speaking about www/typo* ports? If yes, those ports have hardcoded PORTVERSION at pkg-plist. One can use make variables to dramatically reduce pkg-plist changes: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/plist.htm= l#PLIST-SUB --=20 WBR, bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?81610638>