Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:15:49 -0400 From: J.C. <human2205@gmail.com> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD News blog Message-ID: <818ba6630807271515u2eaa4ddbqa883c5c380529843@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080727222339.1357308e@ayiin> References: <a37628830807241634v21753265l5d97f28cdb0ca061@mail.gmail.com> <4889A0ED.9000103@apriliaforum.net> <20080727222339.1357308e@ayiin>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Folks want an OS, not a religion - this is where we beat Linux single >> handed. > > probably one of the nicest (+ more accurate) comparisons i've yet read on this. > couldn't agree more... I second that. Being a computer lover, I was drawn to free/open source software because of its superior quality, the elevated levels of competence of its users, and the comparatively limitless technical capabilities. Software freedom is very attractive but hardly a moral requirement, not to mention an absolute non-issue for the unsophisticated 99% of computer users. I began looking at the BSDs, etc. after being repulsed by the unintelligent religiosity of the GNU/Linux communities, especially (with a few exceptions) the senseless illogic and useless appeals to emotion of one of Free Software's most outspoken advocates. I was surprised to learn that what I valued most about "Linux systems" is actually true of *any* UNIX or UNIX-like operating system. Then I learned that FreeBSD is both reasonable towards proprietary software *and* a better operating system internally, and I was sold. >> It is of utmost importance to tell a Windows user, that we are NOT Linux. >> Don't say FreeBSD is a Linux alternative - they might get the wrong >> impression. There are very subtle psychological fallacies at work with Linux. Take laundry detergent as an example. Manufacturers have long known that many people choose their brand of detergent using trivial (and I would argue nonsensical) criteria, like the images, shapes, and colors of the packaging, vivid word imagery like "Fresh Breeze" or "Refreshing Lavender", perceived (instead of actual) quality differences resulting from advertising or higher price, the imagery used in advertising, the smell, the perceived status of using higher-priced detergent, or simply being the same brand that one grew up with. Thus, companies like Proctor & Gamble actually have several brands of laundry detergent "competing" with each other to increase the likelihood that a customer will choose one of their brands. This is also why there are so many "makes" of GM automobiles. I remember how, growing up, my father would never fill up at any gas station except Mobile (a common gas station chain in the eastern United States) because they had "better gas", and, for a long time, I believed that. Does Mobile really have better gas than their competitors? I doubt it. Did my dad know that gas stations like Mobile routinely buy gas from other chains that they're supposedly competing with? *That's* a good question. : ) What first frustrated me about Linux is actually the main reason for its popularity: the hundreds of distributions of the exact same operating system with mostly the exact same software, differing only by mostly trivial characteristics like the choice of desktop environment or package management system, which applications are included by default and in the repositories, the default theme of the user interface, and the wallpaper. And users will actually argue over which is better. Even though it's possible to use Red Hat packages and repositories to maintain a live "Debian" system, for example. Ubuntu is a particularly "fashionable" distribution at the moment. Flashy? Certainly. Accessible? Sure. I always keep an Xubuntu Live CD on hand for when I just want a graphical operating system up and working quickly. But as a primary operating system, is it that much better than mature distributions like Fedora? Not really. Do its annoying design limitations in the name of "accessibility" and immaturity piss me off? Very quickly. Its popularity is mainly because of those trivial secondary characteristics, i.e. it's "cool". Experienced Linux users know that Linux is Linux is Linux, but many don't seem to know that Unix is Unix is Unix, and Linux is just another Unix*. This is a great place to start talking about Unix. Those powerful command lines in "Linux" that they love so much? They work the same on *any* UNIX-like system. Shell scripts? Configurable window managers? Desktop environments? Apache? Postgre? MySQL? PHP? All identical. So many of the things people love about "Linux" are really characteristics of UNIX-like systems. Talk about why Unix is so great. Explain that Linux is not Unix. Then explain why FreeBSD is better than Linux. If that doesn't work, maybe we could make a hundred different distributions of wallpaper and desktop themes, to ease the transition a little bit? ; ) I would also caution against going after Windows users too aggressively. FreeBSD is for users who can handle a UNIX-like operating systems. Ample documentation and an approachable community do not change the fact that any UNIX-like system, be it Linux, FreeBSD, or any other, is considerably more difficult to learn and less accessible than a Windows system. Since about 99% of computer users have no computer literacy at all, there are many people for whom *any* Unix system is completely inappropriate. The emergence of quality free software for Windows (particularly GPL-licensed software; the GPL is a much more useful license for Windows software than for Unix) can help close the functional gap for Windows users and perhaps ease the transition, as it did for me. Really, it's just about the software. - Jonathan _____ *UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group, all rights reserved, blah blah blah, but Unix is not. "Unix" is a genericized ex-trademark describing any UNIX-like opearting system, as well as the general characteristics of such a system. Capitalization matters.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?818ba6630807271515u2eaa4ddbqa883c5c380529843>