Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 10:48:01 -0000 From: "Barry Scott" <tsbarry@nortelnetworks.com> To: "'Archie Cobbs'" <archie@whistle.com>, hm@hcs.de Cc: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG, julian@whistle.com Subject: RE: i4b and netgraph (was: I4B support for US ISDN?) Message-ID: <81C8165DD2A7D111AD700000F81F29CB02504A3A@nwcwi19.europe.nortel.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In order to minimize latency, all netgraph operations are functional. direct call vs. queuing does not have this advantage if you compare optimum solutions using both methods. e.g. take into account reentracy issues and event sequencing. Do you queue the create hook and delete hook events? I'm reasured that you have queuing, shame its not the default. Barry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?81C8165DD2A7D111AD700000F81F29CB02504A3A>