Date: 1 Sep 2000 10:26:26 +0300 From: "Andriy Korud" <akorud@polynet.lviv.ua> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: ALTQ integration? Message-ID: <8250759177.20000901102626@polynet.lviv.ua> In-Reply-To: <20000901060134N.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> References: <8630326.20000831203057@polynet.lviv.ua> <20000901060134N.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Kenjiro, Friday, September 01, 2000, 12:01:34 AM, you wrote: Kenjiro> Andriy Korud wrote: >> Is ALTQ integrated into FreeBSD4-STABLE? Kenjiro> not yet. >> If no, is there exist some branch? Kenjiro> not in the FreeBSD tree. >> If no, will ALTQ 2.2 apply to 4-STABLE or 4.1-RELEASE? Kenjiro> altq-2.2 supports only 4.0. >> Will there be any difference between KAME source tree and integrated >> ALTQ? Kenjiro> The latest KAME snap supports 4.1 and has altq-3.0a that is still Kenjiro> under development. >> And last: >> If I need production router with ALTQ on dc and sppp interfaces on the >> next week, which is the best solution? Kenjiro> You have 2 choices: Kenjiro> - FreeBSD-4.0R + altq-2.2 Kenjiro> - FreeBSD-4.1R + KAME snap Kenjiro> -Kenjiro OK, more questions: 1. Where can I get userland tools for ALTQ in KAME snap? 2. I CVSUPed KAME snap yesterday and in if_dc.c found comments something like "driver broke xxx, disabling ALTQ for this chip". So, is ALTQ actually supported on dc interface? (DLINK DFE-570TX) 3. If I need only ALTQ and don't need IPv6 and IPSEC, I think I don't need to patch userland FreeBSD's software? -- Best regards, Andriy mailto:akorud@polynet.lviv.ua To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8250759177.20000901102626>