Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:52:52 +0800 From: darcsis@gmail.com (Denise H. G.) To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should Gnome2 meta port include security/pinentry-gtk2? Message-ID: <864ozyskxn.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name> In-Reply-To: <1232157465.1547.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> (Joe Marcus Clarke's message of "Fri\, 16 Jan 2009 20\:57\:45 -0500") References: <86vdsghdum.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name> <1232157465.1547.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> writes: > On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 21:56 +0800, Denise H. G. wrote: >> It seems that without security/pinentry-gtk2, seahorse wouldn't get full >> functions, such as adding new names to an existing key. > > Is this documented anywhere? > > Joe > I haven't found it on seahorse's official site. But I got this on redhat's bug archives and gentoo's: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474419 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159505 >> >> -- darcsis ZAI gmail DIAN com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864ozyskxn.fsf>