Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:38:39 +0200 From: Wolfram Fenske <Wolfram.Fenske@Student.Uni-Magdeburg.DE> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 Message-ID: <864pwqf38w.fsf@student.uni-magdeburg.de> In-Reply-To: <20060806082927.GA17297@engelschall.com> (Ralf S. Engelschall's message of "Sun, 6 Aug 2006 10:29:27 %2B0200") References: <20060805155548.EBE837302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060805220746.U9314@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060805223658.X9314@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060806082927.GA17297@engelschall.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Ralf S. Engelschall" <rse@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
>
>> Or, maybe, the following would be less ugly:
>>
>> Index: optr.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin/dump/optr.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.33
>> diff -u -r1.33 optr.c
>> --- optr.c 5 Aug 2006 12:50:38 -0000 1.33
>> +++ optr.c 5 Aug 2006 18:38:21 -0000
>> @@ -209,14 +209,15 @@
>> mins = (deltat % 3600) / 60;
>>
>> tdone_str = ctime(&tdone);
>> + tdone_str[(strlen(tdone_str) - 1)] = '\0';
Shouldn't this be
tdone_str[strlen(tdone_str)] = '\0';
or did you mean to truncate the last character?
Wolfram Fenske
--
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864pwqf38w.fsf>