Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:06:21 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Eric <freebsdlists-ports@chillibear.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Print +REQUIRED_BY as tree? Message-ID: <865325899.20110912230621@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CA940116.21806%freebsdlists-ports@chillibear.com> References: <503309410.20110912205856@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CA940116.21806%freebsdlists-ports@chillibear.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Eric. You wrote 12 =F1=E5=ED=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 21:33:58: > Not aware of a command line tool, but the beta version of the freshports > website show what ports require the selected port in order to run, which > what I think you want. Oh. For gcc45, for example, list is soobig, that command line tool, working only on installed ports, will be much more useful. And it is too fresh :) I have gcc44 installed (and needed to RUN something!), and it is deprecated. freshports doesn't know about gcc44 a lot, because it uses more new ports database. And I don't understand, which port in +REQUIRED_BY of gcc44 is root of all this evil -- IMHO, I don't have any ports, which needs gcc to RUN :) --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?865325899.20110912230621>