Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:03:35 -0700 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: "Matt Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port dependencies Message-ID: <86bp0oy49k.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <000301cbf0d5$f0de1e60$d29a5b20$@on.ca> (Matt Emmerton's message of "Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:33:16 -0400") References: <4D96668C.3090406@telting.org> <20110402025150.39722549.freebsd@edvax.de> <000301cbf0d5$f0de1e60$d29a5b20$@on.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Matt" == Matt Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> writes: Matt> Every time I see a webserver with X11 on it, it's because of these two. Of Matt> course, using ghostscript*-nox11 as well as setting WITHOUT_X11=yes solves a Matt> lot of this mess, but on a system that's already been "infested", it's Matt> easier just to rebuild from scratch. That's one of the first things I do with a fresh system that will be only a server: echo "WITHOUT_X11=yes" >> /etc/make.conf And then *never* use packages. Only ports. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86bp0oy49k.fsf>