Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:44:45 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: /stand/camcontrol Message-ID: <86bp8h5mn6.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Consider the following commit: r89471 | joerg | 2002-01-17 21:26:14 +0100 (Thu, 17 Jan 2002) | 8 lines Provide an option to make camcontrol `minimalistic': if the (env/make) variable RELEASE_BUILD_FIXIT is defined, a camcontrol binary will be built that only knows the "rescan" and "reset" subcommands. The resulting code is small enough to still fit onto the boot floppy. This makes /stand/camcontrol completely useless. Do we still care about fitting sysinstall on a floppy? The full camcontrol is about 100 kB larger than the pared-down version, but I'm not sure the difference is that big when it's crunched with the rest of /stand. text data bss dec hex filename 268751 26464 54112 349327 5548f camcontrol-crunch 355122 27064 58904 441090 6bb02 camcontrol-full DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86bp8h5mn6.fsf>