Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 11:06:08 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /bin/sh doesn't run autoconf'ied configure scripts correctly Message-ID: <86d5h6iinj.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <C367155D-181F-4AE4-BB3E-707A0B92D86F@FreeBSD.org> (Ade Lovett's message of "Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:23:15 -0800") References: <44013740.6000609@kashzone.info> <86r75qednn.fsf@xps.des.no> <440248FD.6080806@paradise.net.nz> <86veuz7c9u.fsf@xps.des.no> <4404CB8E.1020300@paradise.net.nz> <86lkvu64my.fsf@xps.des.no> <C367155D-181F-4AE4-BB3E-707A0B92D86F@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Of course, the next step, now that the pain of the single libtool is > mostly behind us (devel/gnu-libtool is slated for demolition fairly > soon) Huh? Why? What will developers working on software that uses libtool use? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86d5h6iinj.fsf>