Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 02:36:36 +0900 From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org> To: des@flood.ping.uio.no Cc: vns@delta.odessa.ua, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linprocfs and vmware Message-ID: <86k8irgdej.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: In your message of "25 Mar 2000 15:15:34 %2B0100" <xzpk8irxhix.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzpk8irxhix.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 25 Mar 2000 15:15:34 +0100,
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> wrote:
> Now that linprocfs is in the tree (in both 4.0 and 5.0), there's no
> need for fakeprocfs.sh and ${PREFIX}/bin/vmware can be a simple
> symlink to ${PREFIX}/lib/vmware/bin/vmware.
Great! I've just started working on refining emulators/vmware as the
first step. (fakeprocfs support got to be dropped) When done, I'll
tell PW to repocopy it to have emulators/vmware2. :)
You know, I asked Vladimir some questions a few days ago but got no
response yet... I just wonder if we can separate vmmon from the
vmware port so that vmware and vmware2 can share it.
Unfortunately I have no VMware 1.1 license (but 2.0) and my trial
period had ended quite some time ago and I can't try it myself. ;(
Any testers? I mean: does VMware 1.1 work with vmmon-freebsd-0.95 and
vmnet-freebsd-0.11 pair?
--
/
/__ __
/ ) ) ) ) /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( <knu@idaemons.org>
"If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k8irgdej.wl>