Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:58:02 +0300 From: Mikolaj Golub <trociny@freebsd.org> To: Anton Yuzhaninov <citrin@citrin.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: truss Message-ID: <86mxe0r8o5.fsf@in138.ua3> In-Reply-To: <j57bm4$3lk$1@dough.gmane.org> (Anton Yuzhaninov's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:13:56 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <4E5E46A4.3060705@citrin.ru> <4E6A99A9.1000204@delphij.net> <j4pgu9$m94$1@dough.gmane.org> <864o0adkva.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <j57bm4$3lk$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Anton Yuzhaninov wrote to Mikolaj Golub: AY> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:46:01 +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote: MG>> Could you please run ktrace with -i option? The behavior is like if MG>> ptrace(PT_TRACE_ME) failed in the child by some reason. Unfortunately, truss MG>> does not check this. AY> ktrace -i for truss sleep 5 AY> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8798217/tmp/truss_ktrace2.txt Although ptrace(PT_TRACE_ME,0,0,0) returned 0 the process did not stop after execve() and wait4() in parent (which was actually waiting for this stop) returned only after the child exit. No I idea why so far :-). -- Mikolaj Golub
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86mxe0r8o5.fsf>