Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:51:27 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Trond =?utf-8?Q?Endrest=C3=B8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does anyone use nscd? Message-ID: <86obxw4s4w.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110041800290.18373@mail.fig.ol.no> ("Trond =?utf-8?Q?Endrest=C3=B8l=22's?= message of "Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:19:38 %2B0200 (CEST)") References: <86sjn84wco.fsf@ds4.des.no> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110041800290.18373@mail.fig.ol.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Trond Endrest=C3=B8l <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> writes: > It's in daily use at Gj=C3=B8vik Technical College (Fagskolen i Gj=C3=B8v= ik),=20 > here in Norway. Both the mail and web servers authenticates our users=20 > by LDAP, and nscd certainly speeds up the lookups. OK. No trouble with clients dying of SIGPIPE? I could never reproduce the bug, but both users who reported problems used ldap, and I don't have an LDAP server to test against, so I thought it might be specific to LDAP. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86obxw4s4w.fsf>