Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:21:48 -0800
From:      merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
To:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: how do I tell ports that perl5.8 should never be installed?
Message-ID:  <86pr3ohs9f.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B8B8EF4.9040806@infracaninophile.co.uk> (Matthew Seaman's message of "Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:55:00 %2B0000")
References:  <86zl2tkrrv.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <6201873e1002281349n2bcfd16dte6fdce53cd14c1db@mail.gmail.com> <86iq9hkoxf.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <6201873e1002281738o35444a7ahcc184951f712f0a7@mail.gmail.com> <86ocj8kee0.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <6201873e1002281742i687c2d41y44e3e0f97f35166f@mail.gmail.com> <86k4twke6h.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <4B8B8EF4.9040806@infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> writes:

Matthew> For best results, install from ports rather than packages.  If it's
Matthew> pure-perl code, then this should be hardly more onerous than installing
Matthew> a compiled package.  XS code however will chew up some CPU cycles.

I don't mind installing from ports once I've been notified that the package
won't work because it wants perl5.8.

What I want is a way to tell the port/package system that perl5.8
doesn't exist so that it *will* fail.

How do I do that?

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>;
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86pr3ohs9f.fsf>