Date: 12 Jul 2000 05:04:30 +0900 From: CHOI Junho <cjh@kr.FreeBSD.org> To: "Eugene Furs" <justas@mbank.lv> Cc: "Will Andrews" <andrews@technologist.com>, <steve@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>, sano@debian.org Subject: Re: ports/19238: sgmltools1 Message-ID: <86sntg77sh.fsf@gradius.myhome> In-Reply-To: "Eugene Furs"'s message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2000 09:57:15 %2B0200" References: <200007100125.SAA13025@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000709221427.E9388@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <86puommam4.fsf@gradius.myhome> <003501bfeb0d$a12c23f0$0201a8c0@inc.mbank.lv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "EF" == Eugene Furs <justas@mbank.lv> writes:
> sgml-tools 1.0.x and 2.0.x(or -lite) is very different tools(one for
> linuxdoc DTD and one for DocBook DTD).
>
> In fact, sgml-tools 1.0.x is dead. But there is still need to use
> is
> maintaining linuxdoc-tools, a successor of sgml-tools-1.0.x. It
> includes many bug-fixes after sgml-tools-1.0.9 and more international
> support(Japanese, and Korean in near future).
>
> If you wish to import sgmltools1, please change linuxdoc-tools instead.
>
> http://www.debian.org/~sano/linuxdoc-tools/
>
> --
EF> Is linuxdoc-tools completely compatible with sgml-tools-1.0.x ?
EF> Can I use it instead of sgml-tools-1.0.x with kdevelop (with no changes
EF> to kdevelop)?
I think, yes. Please consult this issue with Sano-san, the maintainer
of linuxdoc-tools.
--
+++ Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my employers +++
CHOI Junho <cjh@FreeBSD.org> <cjh@kr.FreeBSD.org>
KFUG <http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org>; Web Data Bank <http://www.wdb.co.kr>;
FreeBSD, GNU/Linux Developer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~cjh
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86sntg77sh.fsf>