Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 19:43:35 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> Cc: ronald-lists@klop.ws, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: error -9 on build cluster? Message-ID: <86tt52kn94.fsf@ltc.des.dev> In-Reply-To: <710FE881-65FF-4B72-A128-77DBE8A5E93F@yahoo.com> (Mark Millard's message of "Fri, 30 May 2025 10:25:04 -0700") References: <710FE881-65FF-4B72-A128-77DBE8A5E93F.ref@yahoo.com> <710FE881-65FF-4B72-A128-77DBE8A5E93F@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > This is preceded by an 800-line list of warnings from a single source > > file (multi_index_block.cpp). This list is clearly truncated as it's > > missing the final =E2=80=9CN warnings generated=E2=80=9D line, so my gu= ess is there is > > at least one error there as well which just doesn't get displayed. > My guess: the failure occurred while the warnings were otherwise > still being generated and that is what stopped the warnings. That's possible. If we assume that the error code returned by scons is an errno, it corresponds to EBADF. Perhaps a bug in scons causes it to lose track of the pipe it uses to read the compiler's stderr. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86tt52kn94.fsf>