Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:53:01 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: Paolo Bormida <pbormida@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: amule-10275 Message-ID: <86tylij8pu.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinNPgm5pJS-OY28t5fScwtv%2BKHg-rXeBMqJd9Ht@mail.gmail.com> (Paolo Bormida's message of "Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:42:37 %2B0200") References: <AANLkTinNPgm5pJS-OY28t5fScwtv%2BKHg-rXeBMqJd9Ht@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paolo Bormida <pbormida@gmail.com> writes: > Does amule2 port switched from a stable 2.2.5 release to a daily > snapshot? Yes, snapshots are gonna be used unless there are more frequent releases upstream. You can find the history of changes on freshports. http://www.freshports.org/net-p2p/amule2 The package name also switched from `aMule' to `amule' in order to remove silly vendor capitalization and match port *directory* name. Besides, I plan to rename the port to plain `amule' with the next update in order to remove last bit of confusion, i.e. `2' version suffix in port directory name and in LATEST_LINK. > Does the sparc64 port still has the daily snapshot instead of the more > up-to-date 2.2.6_4 available? aMule-10266.tbz and amule-10275.tbz are newer than aMule-2.2.6_4.tbz unless I'm missing smth. $ pkg_version aMule < $ portmaster -L ===>>> aMule-2.2.6_4 ===>>> New version available: amule-10275 I can only find aMule-10266.tbz for sparc64 for 8-stable, though.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86tylij8pu.fsf>