Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 15:24:57 +0900 From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org> To: lioux@uol.com.br Cc: hetzels@westbend.net, asami@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS handling Message-ID: <86u2f8bq6e.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sun, 4 Jun 2000 01:24:53 -0300" <20000604012453.A446@Fedaykin.here> References: <200006021931.MAA67682@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <200006031234.OAA13213@peedub.muc.de> <20000603144658.A7092@Fedaykin.here> <00a901bfcd8a$e6b0f180$8dfee0d1@westbend.net> <20000604012453.A446@Fedaykin.here>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sun, 4 Jun 2000 01:24:53 -0300,
lioux@uol.com.br wrote:
> @ldconfig
> @ldunconfig
>
> These would simplify all libraries. Who mentioned cpp?
> That really sounds marvelous, however, do we desire
> the extra level of complexity? I do, but do the others?
I'd like it too.
Also I wish we'd have something instead of:
@unexec rmdir %D/foo/bar 2>/dev/null || true
which cannot look but only a workaround due to lack of a directive
that does remove a directory if empty.
Maybe, we could extend @dirrm to accept some options like `-i' ?
(Ignore errors)
--
/
/__ __
/ ) ) ) ) /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org
"We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86u2f8bq6e.wl>