Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:02:54 +0200
From:      Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
To:        Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Cc:        Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>, Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: symlink to /boot/loader.efi
Message-ID:  <8711C4A5-6329-4FB2-9D7A-4C7215595110@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <5879A778-0522-4E0F-A569-731E5EC85C18@yahoo.com>
References:  <AF65AD57-5D93-4FC2-84E8-58E1D7C0C3BC.ref@yahoo.com> <AF65AD57-5D93-4FC2-84E8-58E1D7C0C3BC@yahoo.com> <94C108FE-3D2F-4116-B071-810F64DECEC4@me.com> <5879A778-0522-4E0F-A569-731E5EC85C18@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On 22. Dec 2023, at 11:54, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote:
>=20
> On Dec 22, 2023, at 01:36, Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On 22. Dec 2023, at 11:09, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon_at_dec.sakura.ne.jp> wrote on
>>> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 23:21:00 UTC :
>>>=20
>>>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:22:14 +0100
>>>> Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> Yeah, my procedure is the same as yours: I first copy =
/boot/efi/efi/freebsd/loader.efi to /boot/efi/efi/freebsd/loader.old, =
then copy the freshly built and installed /boot/loader.efi to =
/boot/efi/efi/freebsd/loader.efi. I don't see a technical reason why =
this could not be just another step in the installworld procedure.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> That said, I am unsure if the pathname /boot/efi/efi is always the =
same, at least for all UEFI systems. It is the default layout when you =
do a regular install with recent installer onto a UEFI system, but some =
users may use completely different mount points. So you should still =
have some way of configuring the default location for loader =
installation.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Also, on default installations a fallback entry named =
/boot/efi/efi/boot/bootx64.efi is made, essentially another copy of =
loader.efi but with a different name. Namely, the default name that UEFI =
(on x86_64 at least) searches for, if it doesn't know anything else. =
I.e. if it isn't configured via efibootmgr(8), or the EFI variables have =
been junked for some reason. It might make sense to also update that =
file.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> -Dimitry
>>>>=20
>>>> Just an idea.
>>>>=20
>>>> It would be nice if loader.efi (hopefully, boot1.efi,too) could =
pass
>>>> "where am I placed?" info, maybe via kenv.
>>>>=20
>>>> Would need boot1.efi to pass something (ideally, "where am I booted
>>>> from?", but "boot1_used=3D1" is sufficient).
>>>>=20
>>>> To do so, loader.efi can confirm whether it was loaded via =
boot1.efi or
>>>> directly from UEFI firmware. If nothing is passed to it, it can =
probe
>>>> "where it is?" using UEFI call and set it, otherwise, it should
>>>> be /boot/loader.efi, so nothing is needed to do.
>>>=20
>>> To my knowledge aarch64 and armv7 never use the copy in
>>> /boot/loader.efi during a boot. It has to have been copied
>>> into the appropriate msdosfs such that it has an
>>> appropriate path and name there. That is what is found
>>> and used during the boot.
>>=20
>>=20
>> All UEFI systems start from ESP (EFI System Partition). The only good =
reason to install boot1.efi there is when you have very small ESP and =
need to save that space - and in that case the boot1.esp will search and =
execute /boot/loader.efi.
>=20
> Yep. May be I misinterpreted what the text strongly tied to
> "it should be /boot/loader.efi" and so ended up not pointing
> out an actual distinction.
>=20
>> The problem about boot1.efi (or any other UEFI chainload) is that =
loading file and executing it will not replace current program in =
memory, but will add new one, this may be problem with systems with =
minimal memory configurations. And yes, boot1.efi is not really platform =
specific - it is just another EFI application - one can build and use it =
on arm (or any other) systems
>=20
> Not powerpc (32-bit), powerpc64, or powerpc64le: these are
> not UEFI systems at all, if I understand right.


Yes, building EFI application implies platform with UEFI support.=20

rgds,
toomas

>=20
> Of course, if only tier 1 is documented, such would not be
> covered. But documentation that is limited to tier 1 should
> say so explicitly --but various examples have historically
> not done so.
>=20
>> and then it will load and start /boot/loader.efi.
>>=20
>> starting loader directly from ESP has few advantages =E2=80=94 you =
wont waste memory for boot1.efi, you save a bit of boot time, you can =
use auxiliary files from ESP to pass some information to loader.efi (for =
example to tell where your rootfs is in case of multiboot setups).
>>=20
>> the boot1.efi could be a bit more appealing if it would be able to =
load and start kernel directly, allowing to build very memory limited =
setups, but then again, it does sound like very specific corner case.
>=20
> Thanks for the UEFi-context notes that go well beyond anything
> I referenced. Good stuff.
>=20
>> rgds,
>> toomas
>>=20
>>=20
>>>=20
>>>> If no related kenv is set and freebsd-boot partition exists, it =
should
>>>> be booted with legacy (BIOS) boot.
>>>=20
>>> If there even is a "legacy (BIOS) boot" is a platform
>>> specific issue as far as I know.
>>>=20
>>>> The easiest to be set by loader.efi and/or boot1.efi would be raw =
UEFI
>>>> device path. So would need analyzing where actually is on booted
>>>> FreeBBSD environment.
>>>=20
>>> See the earlier point about aarch64 and armv7 not using
>>> /boot/* files while loading the FreeBSD loader: the
>>> FreeBSD loader variant used is the first stage able to
>>> look inside UFS or ZFS file systems. Loading and
>>> starting the FreeBSD loader happens before that stage
>>> in those types of contexts.
>>>=20
>>>> . . .
>>>=20
>>> Also, to my knowledge, powerpc (32-bit), powerpc64, and
>>> powerpc64le do not involve any variant of loader.efi or
>>> UEFI/ACPI or UEFI/DeviceTriee in their boot sequnces.
>>> Again: more platform specific rather than generic.
>>>=20
>=20
>=20
> =3D=3D=3D
> Mark Millard
> marklmi at yahoo.com
>=20




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8711C4A5-6329-4FB2-9D7A-4C7215595110>