Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:56:46 +0900 From: Hidetoshi Shimokawa <simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: Christian Laursen <xi@borderworlds.dk> Cc: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NEC uPD72873 Message-ID: <87n08arext.wl@tora.nunu.org> In-Reply-To: <86isiy99fg.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> References: <86isja24y0.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> <87ptd6rj6n.wl@tora.nunu.org> <86isiy99fg.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 26 Jan 2004 13:33:07 +0100, Christian Laursen wrote: > > Hidetoshi Shimokawa <simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> writes: > > > Sorry to respond you late. > > Is the driver statically linked with kernel or loaded as a module? > > It is loaded as a module? > > Should I try to compile it into the kernel? Can you put the following line into the /boot/loader.conf? firewire_load="YES" I found a race between fwohci and firewire initialization recently. If you load firewire.ko manually after boot, it could happen that fwohci tries to attach firewire bus before the firewire driver is loaded. The type of the OHCI chip doesn't matter for this problem. /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa \/ simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp PGP public key: http://www.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~simokawa/pgp.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87n08arext.wl>