Date: 03 Jan 2001 20:57:55 +0100 From: Slawek Zak <zaks@prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dummynet problem Message-ID: <87n1d81k8s.fsf@pf39.warszawa.sdi.tpnet.pl> In-Reply-To: <200101031438.f03Eckw80927@iguana.aciri.org> References: <200101031438.f03Eckw80927@iguana.aciri.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Luigi Rizzo spake thusly: > So i believe you have done some mistake in your config or your > measurement (e.g. some other bottleneck in the net limiting > one flow to 60Kbit, leaving a full 60k to the other no matter how > weight are assigned). I really don't think so. Only those two transfers were active. Config is very simple and looks okay (see the counts for both rules). > Note that running this kind of experiments requires a bit of care -- > with a 10:1 speed ratio, one of the transfer might complete much faster > than the other leaving full bw to the the other flow for 90% > of the time, which in the end causes both flow to show > approx the same speed. Well. It is not the case I think. Both transfers were for big files (~200MB each). I've zeroed the counters after start. Measurments are acuurate according to both rules as well as lftp status messages. Regards, /S To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87n1d81k8s.fsf>