Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:48:10 -0300 From: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raptor: should there be a note in UPDATING? Message-ID: <87pq6j4xj9.fsf@FreeBSD.org> References: <CABG_4jnNGtn5Ge_tgakEHUv%2Bh5YbP3e-V1PmwMXhT9xNO9k1Xw@mail.gmail.com> <87y5l74yoo.fsf@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Someone (TM) should check whether the first include is really necessary,
> or if the code can't include <raptor2/raptor.h>, or if
> -I/usr/local/include/raptor2 can't be passed before
> -I/usr/local/include.
Everything built fine without the {CPP,LD}FLAGS additions here. I'm
tempted to commit that change, but wonder if it will end up breaking
some weird setup...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87pq6j4xj9.fsf>