Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:12:28 +0300 From: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@vlink.ru> To: Andy Hilker <ah@crypta.net> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs Message-ID: <87sm33z55v.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050310160852.GB1718@mail.crypta.net> (Andy Hilker's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:08:53 %2B0100") References: <200503091838.06322.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050310004919.GA34206@hub.freebsd.org> <87ll8vn32j.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <20050310160852.GB1718@mail.crypta.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Andy" == Andy Hilker <ah@crypta.net> writes: >> nullfs is absolutely useless for jail's because TOO slow. Andy> What do you mean exactly, how do you benchmark this? Just ran build of databases/mysql41-server in a jail with nullfs mounted /bin /sbin /lib etc over r/w nfs mounted sandbox. -- DSS5-RIPE DSS-RIPN 2:550/5068@fidonet 2:550/5069@fidonet mailto:dsh@vlink.ru http://neva.vlink.ru/~dsh/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87sm33z55v.fsf>