Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:23:19 -0300 From: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raptor: should there be a note in UPDATING? Message-ID: <87y5l74yoo.fsf@FreeBSD.org> References: <CABG_4jnNGtn5Ge_tgakEHUv%2Bh5YbP3e-V1PmwMXhT9xNO9k1Xw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Backhaus <robbak@robbak.com> writes: > I just had a problem building liblrdf. The cause was raptor-1 was > still installed. Checking UPDATING shows nothing that mentions raptor > after the KDE update last November. > Does there need to a note in UPDATING to uninstall raptor? It seems more appropriate to fix the port: according to the build log posted in <201208211544.18566.lumiwa@gmail.com> (the other liblrdf thread), -I/usr/local/include is being passed before -I/usr/local/include/raptor2, and it is likely that the source code #includes <raptor.h>, which is installed by both raptor and raptor2 (albeit into different directories). Someone (TM) should check whether the first include is really necessary, or if the code can't include <raptor2/raptor.h>, or if -I/usr/local/include/raptor2 can't be passed before -I/usr/local/include.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87y5l74yoo.fsf>