Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:22:06 +0900 From: NAKAJI Hiroyuki <nakaji@jp.freebsd.org> To: Alexander Nedotsukov <bland@FreeBSD.org> Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: converters/libiconv change request for net/samba3 Message-ID: <87zn5r73pt.fsf@roddy.acest.tutrp.tut.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <87vfgy2bz9.fsf@roddy.acest.tutrp.tut.ac.jp> (NAKAJI Hiroyuki's message of "Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:41:46 %2B0900") References: <87acyd8zg0.fsf@roddy.acest.tutrp.tut.ac.jp> <40EA57EB.4060607@FreeBSD.org> <871xjp8sim.fsf@roddy.acest.tutrp.tut.ac.jp> <87fz84lfaw.fsf@roddy.acest.tutrp.tut.ac.jp> <40EB9607.6020906@FreeBSD.org> <87zn6a2cdy.fsf@roddy.acest.tutrp.tut.ac.jp> <87vfgy2bz9.fsf@roddy.acest.tutrp.tut.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The converters/libiconv was updated to 1.9.2 and it cannot solve my problem, that is, much of Japanese characters are not displayed properly via Samba3. I show the wrong and right image for the filename ＷＧ５報告書-6pdf.pdf. The filename is euc-jp. With the combination converters/libiconv and net/samba3, http://www.rc.tutrp.tut.ac.jp/~nakaji/tmp/libiconv-NG.JPG After modifying of converters/libiconv, http://www.rc.tutrp.tut.ac.jp/~nakaji/tmp/libiconv-OK.JPG Where, /usr/local/etc/smb.conf is same in both cases, [global] dos charset = CP932 unix charset = EUCJP-MS display charset = CP932 workgroup = NAKAJI815 security = SERVER password server = boggy log level = 2 log file = /var/log/log.%m max log size = 50 dns proxy = No wins server = 133.15.67.40 ldap ssl = no [homes] comment = %U's Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No nt acl support = No browseable = No You gnome team say libiconv is not wrong, but there exactly is a problem in handling japanese characters when libiconv is combined with samba3. Can you explain why? Is it due to samba3 only? Is it my fault? Another question, in "XML Japanese Profile, W3C Note, 14 April 2000" http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-japanese-xml-20000414/ x-sjis-cp932 (cp932) x-eucjp-open-19970715-ms (eucJP-ms) are listed, and are they implemented in libiconv properly? About these two encodings, new patch for libiconv-1.9.2 is available http://www2d.biglobe.ne.jp/~msyk/software/libiconv/libiconv-1.9.2-cp932.patch.gz which is made by MORIYAMA Masayuki. Please check it. Thanks in advance. -- NAKAJI Hiroyuki
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87zn5r73pt.fsf>