Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 14:11:54 +0200 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> To: Benoit Chesneau <benoitc@enki-multimedia.eu> Cc: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: how to bridge "native" vlan? Message-ID: <8E5C5DFB-B029-4B32-A67B-D09042ACCEE3@punkt.de> In-Reply-To: <mOEoiwDtLyUdBfav7_Ygz5qfW3nQuT7KM1CnKoXN4haHc-j3gQIYC5GK-eIsCWScLlBhntQNZr42XD-2txcOpHG1rykfrb8CbWvcP84iXxs=@enki-multimedia.eu> References: <mOEoiwDtLyUdBfav7_Ygz5qfW3nQuT7KM1CnKoXN4haHc-j3gQIYC5GK-eIsCWScLlBhntQNZr42XD-2txcOpHG1rykfrb8CbWvcP84iXxs=@enki-multimedia.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, > Am 21.04.2022 um 11:29 schrieb Benoit Chesneau = <benoitc@enki-multimedia.eu>: > I have an interface on which multiple vlans are connected. I would = like to bridge the vlan 100 and 200 but also have a bridge for the = "native" vlan 1. I Can setup a bridge for vlan 100 and 200 the way below = I think but how to create a bridge for the "native" vlan? I don't have any experience with netgraph but I do know that you cannot do that with if_bridge(4). If you make the physical interface the member of a bridge, you cannot use additional VLANs on that interface, anymore. Does anybody know if the same restriction applies to ng_bridge(4)? Kind regards, Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de info@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: J=C3=BCrgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian = Stein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8E5C5DFB-B029-4B32-A67B-D09042ACCEE3>